USPTO serial 75065742
VOTED BRAND OF THE CENTURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOTED BRAND OF THE CENTURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92210 Saint Cloud, FR
94220 Charenton Le Pont, FR
92200 Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
92200 Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
92210 Saint Cloud, FR
94220 Charenton Le Pont, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEAL S. GREENFIELD
NEAL S GREENFIELD SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed matter, namely, books, magazines and catalogs containing brand names as voted by consumers throughout the world; engravings and lithographs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising and commercial information agencies; public relations; rental of advertising space; organization of exhibitions for trade demonstrations; public opinion polling for business or advertising purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of organization of competitions between several brand names to determine the one to be voted brand of the century; presentation of live performances, namely, ceremonies during which awards are presented; on-going television programs for awards and production of radio shows for awards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by du Payrat, Bernard
- Other trademarks owned by Verger, Christian
- Other trademarks owned by Zunz, Nicolas
- Other trademarks owned by Zunz, Nicolas
- Other trademarks owned by du Payrat, Bernard
- Other trademarks owned by Verger, Christian
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VOTED BRAND OF THE CENTURY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |