USPTO serial 75065750
LP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas B. Henderson
DOUGLAS B HENDERSON FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | wood pulp for manufacturing purposes; and gardening and landscaping products, namely, humus, peat, planting mix, potting mix, potting soil, and soil conditioner | ABANDONED | — |
| 006 | metal windows and doors | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | computer software for use in the field of designing and installing wooden beams and joists; computer software for use in database management in the field of agricultural, timber, fish, wildlife, and watershed natural resources | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | joint compound and building insulation | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | building products, namely, wallboard, underlayment, sheathing, flooring, siding, plywood, shingles, wood windows and doors, vinyl windows and doors, bricks, particle board, hard board, and hardwood veneer; and playing sand | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | gardening and landscaping products, namely, mulch and bark nuggets | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | warranty programs in the field of home design and construction | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | residential construction services, namely inspection services and consultation services associated therewith; residential construction quality assurance testing and inspection services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | residential architectural design services, namely, engineering services and construction materials testing and consultation services associated therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1999 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |