USPTO serial 75065941
1-800-4-CREDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 1-800-4-CREDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony H. Handal
ANTHONY H HANDAL HANDAL & MOROFSKY80 WASHINGTON STNORWALK, CT 06854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail services; sales services; arranging retail sales; making retail sales on credit to the consumer; retail services involving the sale of goods on credit, said credit being supplied by persons other than applicant; retail services involving the sale of goods on credit being supplied by applicant; retail mail order services, reatail store services, retail store services in the field of jewelry, retail store services in the field of jewelry, watches, and other collectible items; and finance services incidental to retail services, namely, arranging for the purchase of items on credit, arranging for the purchase of jewelry on credit, assisting consumers in obtaining credit for the purchase of jewelry, credit counseling services for persons with past credit problems or a history of bankruptcy, arranging credit for persons with past credit problems or a history of bankruptcy, and arranging credit for persons with goods credit or no credit history | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |