USPTO serial 75066128
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn E. Rzonca
LYNN E RZONCA SCHIFF HARDIN & WAITE7200 SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6473UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed publications, namely, telephone directories, pamphlets about web site design and hosting, brochures, sales and other promotional materials for the on-line product, and proof sheets of web pages and advertising prepared for customers | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | business services, namely, designing and maintaining home pages on a global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of voice, images, data, and documents via computer termnals, telephone and television devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing on-line business directories, public service information, maps, directions, electronic mail and fax services, electronic transactions, voice communications, telephone numbers, and advertisements on local, national and international subjects; designing, programming, and maintaining web sites on a global computer network; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |