USPTO serial 75066504
AD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. IRIS NESS
M IRIS NESS LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | computer firmware and software tool to measure and evaluate the average intensity of acoustic signals in a two-dimensional ultrasound image in real time for medical applications | ABANDONED | Jun 10, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |