Drawing for BIDTRON

USPTO serial 75066809

BIDTRON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIDTRON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD M. ROSENSTEEL

EDWARD M ROSENSTEEL ROSENSTEEL & BECKMANN LLC230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035services in connection with an interactive online and real time commerce place, operating on computer networks, which serves as a forum for purchasers to post requests for products and services which are automatically forwarded to appropriate vendors, for vendors to respond with offers, information and competitive bidding, and for the parties to conclude a valuable purchase and sale transaction, as well as an advertising mediumABANDONED—
038services in connection with an interactive online and real time commerce, operating on computer networks, which serves as a forum for purchasers to post requests for products and services which are automatically forwarded to appropriate vendors, for vendors to respond with offers, information and competitive bidding, and for the parties to conclude a valuable purchase and sale transaction, as well as an advertising mediumABANDONED—
042services in connection with an interactive online and real time commerce place, operating on computer networks, which serves as a forum for purchasers to post requests for products and services which are automatically forwarded to appropriate vendors, for vendors to respond with offers, information and competitive bidding, and for the parties to conclude a valuable purchase and sale transaction, as well as an advertising mediumABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance