USPTO serial 75066883
SAFETY ENSO WORK WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAFETY ENSO WORK WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WEST VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey C. Slater
STACEY C SLATER KLARQUIST, SPARKMAN, CAMPBELL, ET ALONE WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 S W SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective apparel for industrial use, namely, protective gloves, protective mitts, protective aprons, arm protectors, leg protectors, neck protectors, protective spats, protective oversuits, protective jackets, protective pants and protective armour inserts for use in protective clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |