USPTO serial 75067444
PC TALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PC TALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 4Z1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet E. Witt
JANET E WITT ALSTON & BIRDONE ATLANTIC CTR1201 W PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309-3424Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for voice processing and transmission | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |