USPTO serial 75067576
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry J. Renk
HENRY J RENK FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO277 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10172UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | environmental remediation services, namely, waste disposal; land reclamation; and construction of pollution remediation facilities | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | environmental remediation services, namely, soil, waste and/or water treatment services; waste treatment | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | hazardous, radiological and mixed waste management; technical consultation regarding waste disposal; waste removal, namely, hazardous, toxic, radioactive waste; waste management; pollution prevention, namely, air, water, process-by-product; design of waste handling facilities and their construction; demolition and decommissioning; environmental engineering; consultation regarding environmental pollution; environmental engineering regarding hazardous waste handling in facilities; design of pollution remediation facilities; and reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental regulations and laws | ABANDONED | May 17, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |