Drawing for SAINT GERMAIN DESPRES

USPTO serial 75067594

SAINT GERMAIN DESPRES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAINT GERMAIN DESPRES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025swim wear, bath robes, socks, stockings, head wear, blouses, hosiery, footwear, slippers, suspenders, belts, underwear, shawls, nightgowns, sweat shirts, pullovers, shirts, ties, shorts, trousers, breeches, scarves, raincoats, coats, gloves, brassieres, waistcoats, skirts, and pajamasABANDONED—
042restaurant servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 1, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 12, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 18, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 29, 1997DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance