Drawing for SCAT RECORDS

USPTO serial 75067810

SCAT RECORDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCAT RECORDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheri L. Gelfond

SHERI L GELFOND COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035distributorship featuring sound recordings, namely, disc records, audio cassettes and compact discs containing music, and pre-recorded video cassettes and video discs featuring performance by musical groupsABANDONED—
041entertainment services, namely, the production of sound recordings, namely, disc records, audio cassettes and compact discs containing music, and pre-recorded video cassettes and video discs featuring performances by musical groupsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 22, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 31, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 17, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance