USPTO serial 75069594
IDEOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALDERON, ANNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDEOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
94111 Arcueil, FR
94111 Arcueil, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. PATCH
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | chemical products for hygiene, pharmaceutical and veterinary products, namely, pharmaceutical preparations and vitamin-based preparations for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and bone diseases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |