USPTO serial 75070341
ENDOMATIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENDOMATIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Silver Spring, MD
Silver Spring, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUTH MAE FINCH
126 FOREST DRBALTIMORE, MD 21228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | dental handpiece, namely, a dental handpiece used to power burrs and files in the performance of root canals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |