USPTO serial 75070407
SMARTMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene A. Tabachnick
GENE A TABACHNICK REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAY435 SIXTH AVEP O BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical sensor apparatus for sensing the presence or absence of individuals or objects by contact or pressure | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |