Drawing for H2GO

USPTO serial 75071341

H2GO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with H2GO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARC M GORELNIK

MARC M GORELNIK TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032non-alcoholic beverages, aerated waters, mineral waters, soda waters, table waters, waters, syrups and concentrates used in the manufacture of non-alcoholic beverages; beersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 30, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 23, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 5, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 30, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 6, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 16, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 19, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 19, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance