USPTO serial 75071387
BOTTOMS UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOTTOMS UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M6N 4Z3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANET MARVEL
JANET MARVEL MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's clothing, namely, hosiery, socks, swimwear, tights, leotards, leggings, exercise shorts, headbands, and sports bras | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1998 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |