USPTO serial 75071441
R&S TECHNOLOGY CORP.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with R&S TECHNOLOGY CORP.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nora E. Garrote
NORA E GARROTE PIPER & MARBURY1200 19TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | generic prescription medications, namely, blood modifiers, hormones, anti-inflammatory drugs, drugs related to diseases and conditions of the bones, muscles, skin, eyes and ears, the cardiovascular system, respiratory system, central nervous system, reproductive system, urinary system, muscular system and gastrointestinal system; anti-infection drugs; biological drugs, namely, viral vaccines, bacterial vaccines, rabies vaccine, and toxoids; topical drugs, namely, creams and ointments for dermatological and ophthalmic use; anti-neoplastics, anti-impotence drugs, contraceptives, sedatives, oncological drugs, hematological drugs, and analgesics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |