USPTO serial 75071816
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
31800 SAINT GAUDENS, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK COUNSELORS OF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective helmets; protective kneepads for workers, elbow protectors for workers; sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | bicycles; tricycles; carrier tricycles; mountain bikes; mopeds; motorcycles and their parts; anti-theft alarms for automobiles; anti-theft locks for use on automobile steering wheels; lugggage carriers for vehicles; bicycle stands; brakes for bicycles; handle bars for bicycles; frames for bicycles; direction signals for vehicles; pedals for bicycles; vehicle wheels; rims for vehicle wheels; vehicle wheel spokes; pneumatic tires; bicycle pumps; saddles for bicycles and motorcycles; horns for vehicles; mudguards; land vehicle parts, namely, drive gears; connecting rods for land vehicles; hub caps; cranks for bicycles; engines for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 14, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |