USPTO serial 75072315
MYSTIGIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYSTIGIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Waterford, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen Hill Minsker
HELEN HILL MINSKER BEVERIDGE, DEGRANDI, WEILACHER & YOUNGSTE 8001850 M ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | health and/or beauty products and their ingredients, namely, skin creams and cleansers, facial creams and cleansers, skin moisturizer, facial fresheners, skin toners, facial scrubs, body scrubs, exfoliants, massage oils, shampoos, soaps, hair and skin conditioners, deodorant, after-shave, shaving cream, shaving oil, mouthwash, breath spray, body powder, talcs, bath oil, bath beads, bath foam, perfumes, and cosmetics, namely, makeup, lip balm, lipstick, blush, rouge, nailpolish, eyeshadow, face powder, face cream, skin lotions, base and eyeliner | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |