Drawing for SQL-ARCHIVE

USPTO serial 75072617

SQL-ARCHIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SQL-ARCHIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST 16TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in data management, storage management, file migration, and the backup, restoration and archiving of computer system files in networked and heterogeneous computing environments; computer software for library management of computer files; computer system software tools and utilities for backup, restoration and management of files; and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 12, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 12, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 8, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 9, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 24, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 7, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance