USPTO serial 75072784
MALLORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MALLORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Albans, Herts AL3 4DG, GB
St. Albans, Herts AL3 4DG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Teresa C. Tucker
TERESA C TUCKER HAYES, SOLOWAY, HENNESSEY175 CANAL STMANCHESTER, NH 03101-2335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metals, metal alloys, transition metals, and transition metal based alloys consisting of copper, tungsten, silver, nickel, chromium, cobalt, iron, tin, cadmium, molybdenum, zinc, zirconium, silicon, carbon, phosphorus, beryllium all sold in the form of rods, sections, wires, tubes, sheets, plates, powders forgings and machinings for industrial, military and consumer applications; welding and brazing alloys; all being made from the foregoing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |