Drawing for Serial No. 75072989

USPTO serial 75072989

Serial No. 75072989

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75072989?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dean D. Niro

DEAN D NIRO NIRO, SCAVONE, HALLER & NIRO181 W MADISON STSTE 4600CHICAGO, IL 60602-4676

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007circular saw blades for power sawsACTIVEMar 10, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 15, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 15, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 29, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 17, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 1998SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 24, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 9, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance