USPTO serial 75073455
POCKET JOCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POCKET JOCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM E. ALFORD
WILLIAM E ALFORD BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | miniature and tabletop games for playing various tabletop sports or games, namely, hockey, golf, pinball, tether ball, games entailing shooting balls or flying discs through obstacles or rings or at targets, target games using hook and loop or foam flying discs; baseball, darts, bowling like games where players attempt to toss or shoot balls or discs at stationary pins to knock said pins down or get closest to the pin, jacks, pitching type games where players pitch discs attempting to get closest to a wall or stationary object, games where in balls are bounced, popped, or shot toward cups or baskets, football, games wherein players slide discs attempting to place said discs at the edge of a table without have the disc fall off the edge of the table, pick-up sticks and flying discs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |