USPTO serial 75074037
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Internet Florist Association, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Other trademarks owned by Internet Florist Association, Inc.
CARLE PLACE, NY
Internet Florist Association, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Other trademarks owned by Internet Florist Association, Inc.
Internet Florist Association, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Other trademarks owned by Internet Florist Association, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Galgano, Esq.
Thomas M. Galgano, Esq. Galgano & Associates, PLLC20 W. Park Avenue, Suite 204Long Beach, NY 11561UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | electronic order transmissions for florists | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | delivery of gifts and flowers with selected items regarding a particular occasion or theme | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | retail store services featuring fresh flowers, cut flower arrangements, and artificial flowers; blooming and green plants; and balloons, gifts, and novelty items | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 12, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 19, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |