USPTO serial 75074251
CIG - ALERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CIG - ALERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ryba, Helena M.
- Other trademarks owned by Ryba, Helena M.
- Other trademarks owned by Ryba, Chris A.
- Other trademarks owned by Ryba, Chris A.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CIG - ALERT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |