USPTO serial 75074469
TELE-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANOK, DAWNMARIE DISTEFANO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELE-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. S. Van Landingham, Jr.
L S VAN LANDINGHAM JRSTE 5072001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | communications and telephone training system consisting primarily of a power supply, a telephone switching unit, a dial tone telephone line simulator, a single line feature telephone, an attendant display telephone, a multi-button speaker telephone and modular cables; and courseware therefor, namely, printed teachers guides and texts and student's course manuals, workbooks, installation manuals and telephone user's manuals, all sold as a unit to city, county and state officials for official use through direct sales | ABANDONED | Dec 5, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1999 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |