USPTO serial 75074654
ENSORB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 6, 2001
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENSORB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WILLOUGHBY, NEW SOUTH WALES, 2068, AU
WILLOUGHBY, NEW SOUTH WALES, 2068, AU
FRENCHS FOREST, NEW SOUTH WALES 2086, AU
WILLOUGHBY, NEW SOUTH WALES, 2068, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS BEING A CARRIER OR ENHANCED DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE SUBSTANCES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |