USPTO serial 75074825
AUTOCRAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2390666Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 2000
- Examiner
- MERCALDI, ANTHONY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AUTOCRAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; fresh and frozen eggs, butter, non-dairy creamers and cheeses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Consolidated Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Consolidated Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Consolidated Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named AUTOCRAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |