Drawing for ENERGYMAX

USPTO serial 75076667

ENERGYMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGYMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael T. Murphy

MICHAEL T MURPHY ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN, LLP1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2680UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business marketing consulting services, operation of a business for others, namely, energy distribution and procurement, purchasing energy for others, management and consultation in the field of energy infrastructureABANDONED—
037installation of equipment utilized in the consumption of energy, leasing of building machinery, and maintenance and/or repair of equipment utilized in the consumption of energy, consultation management servicesABANDONED—
039distribution of energyABANDONED—
040production of energyABANDONED—
042engineering servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance