Drawing for AUDIO VISION

USPTO serial 75076684

AUDIO VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIO VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George J. Netter

GEORGE J NETTER260 S LOS ROBLES AVESTE 216PASADENA, CA 91101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for a multimedia personal computer to establish two-way audio and video links over oridnary telephone lines between conferencing partiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 13, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 13, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 9, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 22, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 29, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance