USPTO serial 75078110
MEALS TO GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEALS TO GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK C STEPHENSON
MCGRATH N MULLIN & KRATZ PC222 S 15TH ST STE 1400OMAHA, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen prepared meals, meal mixes, entrees and entree mixes consisting primarily of beef, pork, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; side dishes consisting primarily of vegetables, potatoes and/or fruit; stew; soup; chowder; chili; pate; meatballs; meatloaf; french fries; onion rings; potatoes; potato skins; potato cakes; ribs; meat strips; chicken nuggets; chicken wings; chicken patties; chicken fingers; chicken strips; fish sticks; fish fillets; breaded vegetables; stuffed vegetables; egg substitutes; omelettes; fruit cobblers; fruit crisps; fruit cocktails; and vegetable patties | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | frozen prepared meals, meal mixes, entrees and entree mixes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; side dishes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; pasta; bread bowls filled with beef, pork, poultry, seafood, and/or vegetables; pasta bowls filled with beef, pork, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; rice bowls filled with beef, pork, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; bread stuffed with beef, pork, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; tortillas stuffed with beef, pork, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; pitas stuffed with beef, pork, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; wraps; bakery goods; dough; baked dough; bagels; biscuits; bread; buns; muffins; rolls; english muffins; cookies; brownies; doughnuts; dumplings; cakes; cheese cakes; danishes; turnovers; pastries; toaster pastries; pastries filled with meat, vegetables, eggs, egg substitutes, sauces, fruits, fruit spreads and/or cheese; croissants; crepes; creme puffs; pancakes; waffles; toast; cereal; french bread; quiche; piroghi; pretzels; pot pies; dessert pies; egg rolls; wontons; tacos; burritos; tamales; taquitos; nachos; chimichangas; enchiladas; pizza; calzones; cannelloni; strombolis; chalupas; empanadas; fajitas; tortillas; tostadas; ravioli; rellenos; quesadillas; ciobatta; gyros; sandwiches; hoagie sandwiches; club sandwiches; submarine sandwiches; hot dog sandwiches; bagel sandwiches; english muffin sandwiches; croissant sandwiches; stuffed bagels; stuffed pasta; pasta salads; macaroni salads; foccaccia; puddings; tapioca; flavored gelatins; ice cream; ice cream sodas; floats; sundaes; and milk shakes | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | frozen fruit drinks and frozen fruit-flavored drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |