USPTO serial 75078262
THE EVERCHANGE INSTITUTE MAKING LEARNING, IMPROVEMENT AND CHANGE HAPPEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE EVERCHANGE INSTITUTE MAKING LEARNING, IMPROVEMENT AND CHANGE HAPPEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pleasant Hill, CA
Pleasant Hill, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Berg
MICHAEL N BERG PHILLIPS, MOORE, LEMPIO & FINLEY455 MARKET ST STE 1940SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2448UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | consulting in the field of business management | ACTIVE | May 4, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Young, Doyle W.
- Other trademarks owned by Young, Doyle W.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE EVERCHANGE INSTITUTE MAKING LEARNING, IMPROVEMENT AND CHANGE HAPPEN
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |