USPTO serial 75078421
VIASOFT'S IMPACT 2000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIASOFT'S IMPACT 2000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS BAKER & MCKENZIE660 HANSEN WAYP O BOX 60309PALO ALTO, CA 94306-0309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | consulting services in the field of computer programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |