Drawing for VIASOFT'S IMPACT 2000

USPTO serial 75078421

VIASOFT'S IMPACT 2000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIASOFT'S IMPACT 2000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS

DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS BAKER & MCKENZIE660 HANSEN WAYP O BOX 60309PALO ALTO, CA 94306-0309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042consulting services in the field of computer programmingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 31, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance