USPTO serial 75078647
MAGNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Laurent, Quebec H4S 1J9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
GEORGE W LEWIS SPENCER & FRANK1100 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 300 EWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3655UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | scissors, forceps, needle holders, vaginal speculum, hooks, ear syringes, ear curettes, ear loops, neurological hammers, neurological pinwheels, percussion hammers, nasal speculum, nail nippers, dermal curettes, probes and suction | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |