Drawing for DATAMINING SUITE

USPTO serial 75079117

DATAMINING SUITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATAMINING SUITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy T. Tyson

TIMOTHY T TYSON FREILICH, HORNBAKER & ROSEN10960 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1434LOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software programs for data base managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 27, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 28, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 1, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 9, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 16, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 16, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance