USPTO serial 75079323
PROFILES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROFILES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
92400 COURBEVOIE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROLAND PLOTTEL
ROCKEFELLER CTR STATIONP O BOX 293NEW YORK, NY 10185Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software and software packages for data integration and/or data consolidation, namely, for integration and/or consolidation of data to provide determined information about an entity and about which data already exists at different locations and/or in different forms in computer readable format, and/or for rendering said data into a common format, in the fields of tele-communications, banking, insurance, government operation and administration, health and social services, and defense; and computer programs for consolidation of data which data already exists at different forms in computer readable format and for rendering said data into a common readable format | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting engineering services for the management of data processing systems, computer systems, and computer programs; computer programming for others; design and development of data processing systems for managing, billing, business, customer and marketing files | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |