Drawing for WEBHUNTER

USPTO serial 75079459

WEBHUNTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBHUNTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY L NELKIN

AMY L NELKIN DARBY AND DARBY805 3RD AVE FL 26NEW YORK, NY 10022-7557UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use with global computer networks for computer graphics, electronic publishing, graphics communications, image processing, and color management in graphics applications; computer software for use with global computer networks for database analysis, database and spreadsheet applications, crime and fraud investigation, and management of telephone data; computer software for use with global computer networks for developing software applications, converting computer files from one format to another format, and interfacing between computer programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 17, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 4, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance