Drawing for STARCRAFT

USPTO serial 75079619

STARCRAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARCRAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALLEN R GROGAN

LARRY C BOYD GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLPSTE 14004 PARK PLZIRVINE, CA 92614-8557

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009prerecorded motion picture and television films featuring characters from a strategy game of interstellar combat, and audio tapes, video tapes and compact disks featuring characters from a strategy game of interstellar combatACTIVE—
016paper goods, namely, comic books, trading cards, bottle caps, coloring books, adhesive stickers, rub-on transfers, notebooks and portfoliosACTIVE—
021lunch boxes, vacuum flasks and thermally insulated containers for food and beveragesACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, pajamas, hats, sweatshirts, T-shirts, shirts, shoes, jackets, shorts, socks and sweatersACTIVE—
041entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing television show and production of a theatrical motion picture featuring characters from a strategy game of interstellar combatACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2002LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Aug 31, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 7, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2001REINREINSTATED—
May 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 26, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 21, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 4, 2000OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 26, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 22, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 15, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance