USPTO serial 75079675
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald B. Halt, Jr.
GERALD B HALT JR VOLPE AND KOENIG, PC400 ONE PENN CTR1617 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVDPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | wireless and digital telecommunications systems including base stations, remote subscriber units, radio carriers stations, and remote modular cluster units; wireless and digital telecommunications equipment, namely, portable and stationary radiotelephones, encoders, decoders, modulators, demodulators, telephone line connectors, telephone switching terminals, radio correlators, synchronization apparatus for wireless and digital communication, radio transmitters, radio receivers, switches, handsets, antennas, wiring, computer processors, and computer subscriber stations, software for operating the foregoing equipment; radiotelephone accessories, namely, batteries, microphones, and speakers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |