Drawing for H3D

USPTO serial 75080697

H3D

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H3D?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane E. Turriff

DIANE E TURRIFF WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded video tapes, laser discs, CD-ROMs and film formatted for stereoscopic imaging on a wide variety of topics; viewers, namely, stereoscopic eyeglasses; transmitters, namely, interface between stereoscopic eyeglasses and monitor or screen; televisions; film and video projectors; film and video cameras, camera mechanisms, and cameras lenses; video taps, namely, monitors used during filming; computer software for producing stereoscopic imagesABANDONED—
028computer and electronic games; computer game softwareABANDONED—
041entertainment industry services, namely, editing and adapting pre-recorded film, video tapes, laser discs and CD-ROMs to stereoscopic visual imagesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance