USPTO serial 75081396
SMART TRACK JR.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART TRACK JR.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GERMANTOWN, MD
GERMANTOWN, MD
Dallas, TX
GARLAND, TX
LEXINGTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD E MEIER
HAROLD E MEIER BAKER & BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | vehicle tracking and information system, namely, computer software for tracking vehicles and processing GPS position information regarding the location and status of such vehicles; monitors for displaying vehicle location information; and communications equipment, namely, transmitters and receivers for relaying vehicle location information between dispatchers and vehicle operators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by E-Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by RAYTHEON COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMART TRACK JR.
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |