USPTO serial 75081829
MILLION DOLLAR BLACK JACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLION DOLLAR BLACK JACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tobey B. Marzouk
WILLIAM S AKEL SYNAPSIS GAMING SYSTEMS LTD5460 WHITE OAK AVE STE A336ENCINO, CA 91326-2407UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | network of electronically interfaced games comprised of computer hardware and software located at two or more licensed gaming establishments linked to conduct gaming activities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |