Drawing for PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 75082460

PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen B. Crockett

KAREN B CROCKETT GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER333 S GRAND AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009telecommunications equipment, namely, telephones with paging and computing capabilities, modems, cables, computer connectors, headsets, interface card modems for laptop computers, home base stations comprised of receivers, transmitters and antennas, pagers, personal digital assistants for automobile, home and office use, remote telemetry transmitters for test management services, interface cards for model or digital fax accessACTIVENov 13, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2002ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENTโ€”
Jun 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jun 5, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
May 19, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILEDโ€”
Jan 26, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 17, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Jun 26, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
May 4, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Dec 23, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 16, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Jun 7, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
May 10, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Oct 24, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 24, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Sep 11, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Sep 11, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVEDโ€”
May 19, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Jan 2, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jan 2, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Dec 11, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Oct 10, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Sep 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Aug 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jun 26, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Mar 17, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Sep 18, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance