USPTO serial 75082800
GREENLEAF BECAUSE HAPPINESS MAKES GOOD SCENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREENLEAF BECAUSE HAPPINESS MAKES GOOD SCENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Spartanburg, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Moose
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNING, PA700 E N STSTE 15GREENVILLE, SC 29601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | scented granular matter, bag potpourri, sachets, oils, refresher oils, scented envelope sachets, gift box potpourri sets; fireplace potpourri; fragranced products for bath and body, including soaps, hand and body lotions, skin conditioners and cremes, bath oils and gels, bubble baths, air fresheners and aromatic sprays; commercial and consumer display stands and easels; decorative wooden eggs; fragranced inspirational cards; fragranced cards with flower seed packets; stationary and notecard packets; greeting cards; decorative pillows; coordinating placemats, napkins, and napkin rings; decorative jewelry bags; decorative tote bags; scented pinecones; fragrant and/or aesthetic accents, namely lotus pods, pomegranates, wheat, berries, cinnamon sticks, and preserved cedar | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |