Drawing for SMART FLOORS

USPTO serial 75083827

SMART FLOORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARMINE, F. D.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART FLOORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene A. Tabachnick

GENE A TABACHNICK REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAY435 SIXTH AVEP O BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrical sensor apparatus for sensing the presence or absence of individuals or objects by contact or pressureABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 30, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 15, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 18, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance