USPTO serial 75083874
PDV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PDV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Caracas 1010A, VE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory P. LaPointe
GREGORY P LAPOINTE BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, PCSTE 1201900 CHAPEL STNEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | catalysts for use in the treatment of natural crudes and bitumens and residual crudes and bitumens for the production of upgraded hydrocarbon products | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | fuels and lubricants, namely, petroleum based crude oils, drilling muds, and industrial lubricants | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | data processing equipment, namely, computer equipment configured as a neural network in combination with near infrared spectroscope equipment for use in determining the quality of hydrocarbon fuel products | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | bitumen based asphalts | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | transportation by pipeline and land vehicle of hydrocarbon products and storage of same | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | engineering services including services related to processing, refining and burning petroleum products, namely, naturally occurring crudes and bitumens, residual crudes and bitumens and refined hydrocarbon products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intevep, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PDV
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |