USPTO serial 75084494
@WORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3029533Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with @WORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEANA A POLLARD
KISONG KIM LANG-CADITZ CHRISTENSEN O'CONNORJOHNSON & KINDNESS PLLC1420 - FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of computer multimedia production, training in computer multimedia production and consulting in conjunction therewith; and multimedia entertainment and educational software production services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2004 |
| 042 | web page and multimedia software design; project planning in the field of computer multimedia production; computer programming for others in the field of educational multimedia; magnetic and optical media mastering; and distributorship services in the field of multimedia products, namely, prerecorded audio and video tapes, motion picture films, compact disks, CD-ROMs, video disks, and digital audio and video tapes and disks but not for providing multiple user access to a global computer network and not for designing software that enables the provision of multiple user access to a global computer network but not for providing multiple user access to a global computer network and not for designing software that enables the provision of multiple user access to a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |