USPTO serial 75084539
INTERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST 16TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in storing, managing and manipulating personal, business, corporate or organization-wide information, namely, software for use in creating, conforming, exchanging and synchronizing directories, databases, calendars, cardfiles and other data between computer programs, computers, and computer networks; for scheduling and calendaring; for communications, namely, E-mail, voice mail and voice messaging; for word and fax processing; for providing an interface for local and remote accessing of computers, computer networks and information databases; for uploading and downloading data and files; browsing and data retrieval; for monitoring, authorizing, controlling and tracking access to local, wide area and global computer networks; for providing database access; for database management; organizer software providing combinations of the foregoing features in one computer program with a common interface; software for developing other applications software; visual development software tools for developing other software; computer utility software programs; and instructional manuals distributed with the above | ACTIVE | Apr 12, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |