USPTO serial 75086162
Serial No. 75086162
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75086162?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THERA Patent GmbH & Co. KG Gesellschaft fur industrielle Schutzrechte
82229 Seefeld, DE
Other trademarks owned by THERA Patent GmbH & Co. KG Gesellschaft fur industrielle Schutzrechte
DEX, DE
ESPE DENTAL - MEDIZIN GMBH & CO. KG
DEX, DE
Other trademarks owned by ESPE DENTAL - MEDIZIN GMBH & CO. KG
SIH STIFTUNG & CO. INDUSTRIE-HOLDING KG
DEX, DE
Other trademarks owned by SIH STIFTUNG & CO. INDUSTRIE-HOLDING KG
DEX, DE
DEX, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Meyers
LOUIS PIRKEY FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | impression compounds for dental purposes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THERA Patent GmbH & Co. KG Gesellschaft fur industrielle Schutzrechte
- Other trademarks owned by 3M ESPE AG
- Other trademarks owned by ESPE DENTAL - MEDIZIN GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by SIH STIFTUNG & CO. INDUSTRIE-HOLDING KG
- Other trademarks owned by 3M ESPE AG
- Other trademarks owned by ESPE DENTAL AG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |