Drawing for 4 PANEL

USPTO serial 75086391

4 PANEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAVONESE, DANIEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with 4 PANEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN D MURPHY

STEPHEN D MURPHY SCULLY SCOTT MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009scientific, electric, photographic, optical and electronic equipment, namely, TV, video recorders, visual display units, camcorders, photographic and cinematographic cameras and projection apparatus; camera cases especially made for photographic and cinematographic apparatus and instruments; exposed photographic and cinematographic film; dark room lamps, diaphragms for photography, drying apparatus for photographic prints, editing apparatus for cinematographic film, exposure meters, photographic slide transparencies projection apparatus and video screens, photographic slides, slide projectors, blank video tapes, view finders, exposed camera film, exposed color separation film, exposed X-ray film, exposed camera film in the form of cartridges; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of images, namely, computers, computer software, computer firmware, keyboards, fax machines, printer circuit boards, daisy wheel printer, ink jet printers, laser printers, blank magnetic data carriers, blank CD ROMsACTIVE—
016paper, namely, photocopier, paper for use with printers, art paper; inking sheets for duplicating machines; duplicating ink, India ink, writing ink, stamp pad ink, pen ink cartridges; printing blocks, printed matter, namely, books, booklets, brochures, newsletters and circulars, all relating to photography and production, re-production, storage, manipulation and dissemination of still, moving and electronic images, photographic paper, namely, paper sensitized to receive ink, frames for photographic transparencies, holograms (not for medical use)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 1999SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 29, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 28, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 31, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance